<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Backup on Flo&#39;s Thoughts</title>
    <link>https://flohei.de/tags/backup/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Backup on Flo&#39;s Thoughts</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:20:07 +0200</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://flohei.de/tags/backup/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Synology Backup Strategies</title>
      <link>https://flohei.de/2014/11/synology-backup-strategies/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:20:07 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>https://flohei.de/2014/11/synology-backup-strategies/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday I read Marco Arment&amp;rsquo;s piece about his attempts to backup his Synology NAS. They all rely on external services like Amazon&amp;rsquo;s S3 or Backblaze. Since I&amp;rsquo;m happy about every bit and byte that I can store within my own realm, I don&amp;rsquo;t feel to comfortable sending literally &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; my data off to the cloud in some random country with random laws I have no clue about.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Luckily, I have two Synologys that I operate and maintain (one at my apartment and one at my parent&amp;rsquo;s house). This offers a different approach: I could basically &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.synology.com/en-us/knowledgebase/tutorials/461&#34;  class=&#34;external-link&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;backup my NAS systems to one another&lt;/a&gt;. Unfortunately, they are not the same size and the larger one has about four times the capacity of the other one. So this leaves me with a hypothetical one-way backup solution (which is not what I want to achieve). If I upgraded the smaller one I might be able to set up a two-way backup solution.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
